International Hospitality · Leadership · Culinary Culture

CRISTIAN MARINO JOURNAL

English edition

The conversations, judgement and emotional labour involved in running teams rarely appear on staffing plans, but they consume real managerial capacity.

The Work Managers Carry That Never Appears on the Rota

Two kitchen professionals working together during service preparation.

The Wider View · Leadership

Hospitality managers have always worked under pressure. That is part of the job.

A department head can move from a staffing problem to a guest complaint, a budget discussion and a difficult conversation with an employee before lunch. None of those situations is unusual. What has changed is how often people-related issues now sit alongside operational duties, without a separate block of time or a separate role to deal with them.

Alongside standards, costs and service, they are increasingly expected to recognise when someone is struggling, listen well, respond appropriately and know when a problem needs to move beyond a normal workplace conversation.

That is part of good leadership. It also consumes real managerial capacity, even though it rarely appears on a rota, a payroll report or a productivity measure.

Recent research from Hospitality Action gives the issue some scale. In its 2026 Taking the Temperature survey, which gathered responses from more than 600 hospitality professionals in the United Kingdom, 61 per cent of managers said they had been asked in the previous year to support a colleague experiencing a mental health challenge. Forty-seven per cent of respondents wanted more management training to help leaders recognise and respond to mental health and wellbeing concerns, while 83 per cent of managers said taking time to listen was the main support they provided.

The survey is UK-specific and should not be treated as a global measure of hospitality. But the pressure it describes sits within a much wider discussion about how work is designed and managed.

The role now extends beyond the operating checklist

Managing a hotel department has never been only about schedules and standards. Experienced managers know that when a team is stretched, distracted or unsettled, the operation feels it sooner or later.

What is becoming more visible is how much of the job now involves conversations and judgement that do not fit neatly into an operational checklist.

An employee may be dealing with a family problem, exhaustion, financial pressure, conflict with a colleague or a period of poor mental health. The manager is often the first person to notice because they see the change in attendance, concentration, behaviour or performance before anybody else does.

Sometimes a short conversation is enough. Sometimes it is not. Either way, the conversation takes time and attention, and both are finite.

Hospitality is very good at measuring visible output. Rooms cleaned, covers served, labour cost, revenue, guest scores and average spend all have a place on reports. The quieter part of management is much harder to record.

A twenty-minute conversation may prevent a resignation, stop a conflict from escalating or help someone ask for professional support. It may also happen in the middle of a shift when the manager still has the rest of the operation to run.

Listening takes time

Hospitality Action found that listening was the most common way managers supported colleagues. That sounds simple, but good listening requires something managers are often short of: uninterrupted attention.

The employee who needs to talk does not necessarily arrive when the department is calm. The conversation may happen during high occupancy, while a vacancy is still open, while somebody is being trained or while another operational problem is waiting.

A conscientious manager usually makes time anyway.

That time still has to come from somewhere. Paperwork waits, a break gets shortened, the shift runs longer or another conversation is postponed. Sometimes the manager takes the subject home simply because there was nowhere else for it to go that day.

That does not mean managers should stop listening. It means organisations should not treat listening as an unlimited resource that appears automatically whenever it is needed.

Training should create boundaries as well as confidence

The World Health Organization recommends manager training as part of a broader approach to mental health at work. Its guidance focuses on recognising and responding to emotional distress, improving communication and active listening, and understanding how job stressors can affect mental health.

Training also needs clear limits.

A department head is not a clinician. A restaurant manager is not a counsellor. A front office manager should not be expected to diagnose a colleague or personally resolve every difficult situation brought to them.

Managers need enough confidence to begin the right conversation and enough clarity to know when the issue belongs with HR, occupational health, an employee assistance programme, a medical professional or another form of specialist support.

Without those boundaries, a well-intentioned expectation can become another form of overload.

Some wellbeing problems are operating problems

There is also a danger in treating every difficult workplace experience as an individual wellbeing issue.

Sometimes the problem is the way the work has been organised.

The International Labour Organization’s 2026 global report on the psychosocial working environment identifies factors including workload, role clarity, autonomy and working-time arrangements as part of the conditions that can affect workers’ health and performance.

These are management and organisational questions, not personality traits.

If a department has been understaffed for months, better listening does not create another pair of hands. If schedules change constantly with little notice, a wellbeing campaign does not make the rota more predictable. If a manager is responsible for results but has little authority over staffing, expenditure or working methods, resilience training does not repair that mismatch.

Individual support still matters. It simply should not become a substitute for correcting a recurring operational problem.

Reliable people attract more work

Every hotel has people who become known as dependable. They answer the phone. They stay a little longer when service is difficult. They can calm an angry guest, train a new employee and help another department without creating drama.

Those people are valuable, and they are often the ones who move into supervisory and management roles.

Reliability has a side effect. The more dependable someone becomes, the more likely additional work is to land with them.

At first it may be occasional. A difficult guest. A staffing gap. A colleague who needs advice. A problem nobody else quite owns. Over time, the exceptional requests can become part of the normal expectation.

Eventually, the organisation can start relying less on the role itself and more on one person’s willingness to absorb work that the role was never designed to hold.

That can look like strong leadership for a long time. It can also hide a weak structure.

Managers need an escalation path too

Hotels usually understand escalation when the problem is operational. A maintenance issue moves upwards. A serious guest complaint has a route. Financial discrepancies have procedures.

People-related pressures do not always have equally clear routes.

Who does a department head speak to after supporting several members of the team through difficult situations? Who notices when the manager who listens to everybody else has become withdrawn or exhausted? Who temporarily carries part of the workload when that manager reaches capacity?

The answer will differ between organisations. A large group may have HR teams, occupational health, employee assistance programmes and formal referral processes. A smaller independent property may rely more heavily on senior leadership and trusted external support.

The structure will vary from one organisation to another, but there needs to be one.

If managers are expected to recognise when somebody else needs help, they should also know where their own support begins.

Pressure is part of hospitality. Permanent overload should not be.

Hospitality will never become a low-pressure business, nor should that be the test of a healthy operation.

Flights are delayed. Equipment fails. Occupancy changes. People become ill. Restaurants fill unexpectedly. Weather disrupts plans. Guests occasionally need immediate help. There will always be periods when managers and teams have to do more than usual.

The more useful distinction is between pressure that comes with the business and pressure that has quietly become the business model.

A capable manager can carry a great deal, often for longer than the organisation realises. That ability can keep standards intact through difficult periods. It can also delay recognition that the workload, staffing or support around the role needs attention.

Hotels are increasingly asking managers to pay attention to the pressure their teams are carrying.

The same question should be asked of the managers themselves.

A good manager can carry a lot. A good organisation should know when to stop adding to the load.


This article draws on publicly available industry research and sources cited below. Interpretation and editorial analysis are by Cristian Marino Journal.

Further reading

Sources

About the Author